Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Firefox: 0 Chrome: 1
Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Who the hell uses Chrome anywaysMintQ wrote:Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Firefox: 0 Chrome: 1
Dualer wrote: Who the hell uses Chrome anyways
This doesn't help Chrome's cause. Even if what you state is legit.MintQ wrote:Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Firefox: 0 Chrome: 1
So because FF is 'deprecated', Chrome automatically gets better?Hyphen wrote:If something is deprecated that means it's horrible, buggy or plain broken and shouldn't be used ever; the only reason they're kept is for backwards compatibility. Like stop() for Threads in Java.Kohuded wrote:This doesn't help Chrome's cause. Even if what you state is legit.MintQ wrote:Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Firefox: 0 Chrome: 1
[blink]Firefox: 0 Chrome: 0[/blink]
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0Hyphen wrote:No, the <blink> command is deprecated. And Firefox is better anyway so wheeKohuded wrote:So because FF is 'deprecated', Chrome automatically gets better?Hyphen wrote:If something is deprecated that means it's horrible, buggy or plain broken and shouldn't be used ever; the only reason they're kept is for backwards compatibility. Like stop() for Threads in Java.Kohuded wrote:This doesn't help Chrome's cause. Even if what you state is legit.MintQ wrote:Well, <blink> is an abomination of an HTML code and should dieMrLRG wrote:Firefox works.
[blink]Firefox:1[/blink] Chrome:0
Firefox: 0 Chrome: 1
[blink]Firefox: 0 Chrome: 0[/blink]